ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2026
Analytical and clinical validation of the EdenDx methylation assay as a noninvasive supportive triage tool for early detection of endometrial cancer in cervical scraping specimens.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy; however, early detection remains challenging due to overlapping symptoms and the absence of validated noninvasive triage testing. Diagnosis relies on invasive procedures such as endometrial biopsy or dilation and curettage. The EdenDx assay detects hypermethylation of Methods: Analytical validation, including limit of detection (LoD), precision, analytical specificity, and adequacy, was performed using contrived specimens. Clinical performance was evaluated in two specimen types: cervical scraping specimens collected from 18 patients with histologically confirmed EC and 62 patients without EC, and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from 20 patients with EC and 20 without EC, with histopathology as the reference standard. Results: The LoD was 1.5% cancer cells; the coefficient of variation (CV) was <10% across runs and operators, and no interference from common vaginal pathogens or substances was observed. In cervical scraping specimens, sensitivity was 72.2% (13/18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 46.5%-90.3%) and specificity was 96.8% (60/62; 95% CI, 88.8%-99.6%); in FFPE tissue, sensitivity was 85.0% (17/20) and specificity was 90.0% (18/20); in contrived specimens, both sensitivity and specificity were 100%. Overall, the assay demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 90.2% and specificity of 96.2%. Conclusions: The EdenDx assay is analytically robust and detects CDO1/CELF4 hypermethylation in both cervical scraping specimens and FFPE endometrial tissue, with high specificity and sensitivity in cervical scrapings. These findings support further prospective evaluation of the EdenDx assay as a noninvasive triage adjunct to identify high-risk women with or without abnormal uterine bleeding who warrant endometrial sampling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.