ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2026
Untargeted Urinary Metabolomic Profiling Reveals Metabolic Signatures Associated with Anhedonia Severity-Stratified Subgroups in Major Depressive Disorder.
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate urinary metabolite differences between subgroups stratified by anhedonia severity in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and identify potential biomarkers associated with anhedonia using untargeted metabolomic profiling. Methods: Fifty-five MDD patients were recruited and stratified by median Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) total score into Low-SHAPS (n=32) and High-SHAPS (n=23) groups, along with 35 healthy controls (HC). Urinary metabolomic profiling was performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Differential metabolites were identified using one-way ANOVA for multi-group comparisons and independent-sample Results: Three-group ANOVA identified 706 nominally differential metabolites (P < 0.05), of which 115 reached P < 0.01. The contrast between Low-SHAPS and High-SHAPS groups showed the most pronounced differences, with 1608 metabolites reaching nominal significance (P < 0.05). OPLS-DA models demonstrated significant discriminative ability across all pairwise comparisons after permutation testing (Low vs High: cross-validated AUC = 0.726, P = 0.010; Low vs HC: cross-validated AUC = 0.886, P = 0.010; High vs HC: cross-validated AUC = 0.901, P = 0.010). Pathway enrichment analysis revealed significant alterations in tryptophan metabolism and phenylalanine metabolism. Conclusions: MDD patients with differing degrees of anhedonia exhibit widespread urinary metabolic differences. The greater metabolic divergence between High-SHAPS and Low-SHAPS subgroups compared with patient-control comparisons suggests that anhedonia contributes substantially to metabolic heterogeneity in depression. SHAPS-based stratification offers novel metabolomic evidence for precision subtyping and biomarker discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.