Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42861312›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2026

Untargeted Urinary Metabolomic Profiling Reveals Metabolic Signatures Associated with Anhedonia Severity-Stratified Subgroups in Major Depressive Disorder.

Shoucui Xia, Jun Cheng, Guoqing Gao, Qingqing Zhao, Wenzhi Pei, Long Chen, Xulai Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shoucui XiaSchool of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0009-5163-6889
Jun ChengSchool of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Guoqing GaoDepartment of Psychiatry, Anhui Clinical Center for Mental and Psychological Diseases, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6165-2702
Qingqing ZhaoDepartment of Psychiatry, Anhui Clinical Center for Mental and Psychological Diseases, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Wenzhi PeiDepartment of Psychiatry, Anhui Clinical Center for Mental and Psychological Diseases, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
Long ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Anhui Clinical Center for Mental and Psychological Diseases, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-9441-8356
Xulai ZhangSchool of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate urinary metabolite differences between subgroups stratified by anhedonia severity in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and identify potential biomarkers associated with anhedonia using untargeted metabolomic profiling. Methods: Fifty-five MDD patients were recruited and stratified by median Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) total score into Low-SHAPS (n=32) and High-SHAPS (n=23) groups, along with 35 healthy controls (HC). Urinary metabolomic profiling was performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Differential metabolites were identified using one-way ANOVA for multi-group comparisons and independent-sample Results: Three-group ANOVA identified 706 nominally differential metabolites (P < 0.05), of which 115 reached P < 0.01. The contrast between Low-SHAPS and High-SHAPS groups showed the most pronounced differences, with 1608 metabolites reaching nominal significance (P < 0.05). OPLS-DA models demonstrated significant discriminative ability across all pairwise comparisons after permutation testing (Low vs High: cross-validated AUC = 0.726, P = 0.010; Low vs HC: cross-validated AUC = 0.886, P = 0.010; High vs HC: cross-validated AUC = 0.901, P = 0.010). Pathway enrichment analysis revealed significant alterations in tryptophan metabolism and phenylalanine metabolism. Conclusions: MDD patients with differing degrees of anhedonia exhibit widespread urinary metabolic differences. The greater metabolic divergence between High-SHAPS and Low-SHAPS subgroups compared with patient-control comparisons suggests that anhedonia contributes substantially to metabolic heterogeneity in depression. SHAPS-based stratification offers novel metabolomic evidence for precision subtyping and biomarker discovery.

Indexed as

anhedoniabiomarkermajor depressive disordermetabolomicsprecision medicineSHAPSurine

Identifiers

PMID42861312
PMCPMC13654294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.