ReviewCJC open2026
Mouse Models of Aortic Pathologies: Deciphering Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms from Bench to Bedside.
Review in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aortic pathologies, including abdominal aortic aneurysm, thoracic aortic aneurysm, and aortic dissection, are life-threatening conditions characterized by complex pathophysiology and a lack of simple, early, and reliable diagnostic tools. Methods: This review synthesizes current knowledge on the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying aortic pathologies, with a particular focus on vascular smooth muscle cell dysfunction, extracellular matrix degradation, and inflammatory signaling pathways. The review critically evaluates the strengths and limitations of widely used murine models, including elastase infusion, calcium chloride application, angiotensin II infusion, and β-aminopropionitrile administration, in the context of current clinical knowledge. Results: Murine models provide valuable insights into the early stages of disease, which are often inaccessible in humans, and have been instrumental in elucidating key mechanisms involved in aneurysm formation and dissection. These models differ in their anatomic specificity, vascular remodelling dynamics, immune activation profiles, and translational relevance. Emerging complementary approaches, including advanced translational platforms and computational models, further improve the interpretation and translational value of preclinical findings. Conclusions: By linking experimental findings to clinical perspectives, this review proposes a bench-to-bedside framework for the study of aortic disease. Integrating complementary experimental models with human-relevant systems may improve mechanistic understanding and support future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies innovation in aortic aneurysm and dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.