ArticleBrain & spine2026
Passive intraoperative motor fMRI under general anesthesia during open-craniotomy glioma surgery: a prospective technical feasibility study.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sensorimotor localization is important during peri-Rolandic glioma surgery. We assessed passive intraoperative motor functional MRI (pifMRI) under general anesthesia. Research question: Can pifMRI provide useable sensorimotor maps before and after resection for neuronavigation and comparison with cortical stimulation? Material and methods: Eight adults (24-72 years; median, 57.5) underwent pifMRI intraoperatively in a two-room 3-T intraoperative MRI setting. With cranium open, blood oxygen level-dependent signals were elicited by passive flexion-extension of digits II-V. Maps were integrated into neuronavigation and used for corticospinal tract tractography. Given the exploratory sample and absent systematic coordinate-level recording, analyses were descriptive. Results: Useable activation in the primary sensorimotor region was obtained in all patients. Stimulation at pifMRI-defined regions elicited motor responses in all patients. However, negative sites and coordinate-level distances were not recorded, precluding diagnostic-accuracy and distance analyses. Post-resection pifMRI was obtained in seven patients. Median tumor volume decreased from 17.05 to 2.78 cm Discussion and conclusions: This prospective series supports the feasibility of acquiring and integrating pifMRI during glioma surgery, including after resection. Correspondence with positive stimulation sites is hypothesis-generating with no quantitative validation of mapping accuracy or clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.