ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Nodule subtype dependency of CT-based radiomics for preoperative prediction of spread through air spaces in stage I lung adenocarcinoma: a multi-centre study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spread through air spaces (STAS) is an important invasive pattern associated with aggressive behaviour and prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. However, whether nodule subtype influences the performance of computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics for preoperative STAS prediction remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of nodule subtype on CT-based radiomics performance for STAS prediction in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: This was a multi-centre retrospective study, with 1,377 patients in the internal cohort and 436 in the external validation cohorts. Two radiomics models were developed: an all-subtype model (M1) and a pure-solid-specific model (M2). Radiomic features were obtained from preoperative CT images, and model development was performed using Extreme Gradient Boosting. Predictive performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration analysis, and decision-curve analysis. In the external pure-solid cohort, the two models were directly compared using the DeLong test, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Results: M1 yielded an AUC of 0.839 in the internal cohort and 0.865 in the overall external cohort. After external stratification by nodule subtype, the AUCs for non-solid and pure-solid nodules were 0.797 and 0.788, respectively. M2 yielded an AUC of 0.773 in the internal cohort and 0.768 in the external cohort. In the external pure-solid cohort, M1 exhibited superior discrimination (P=0.0018), while M2 yielded more favourable reclassification performance (NRI =0.643; IDI =0.184). Conclusions: CT-based radiomics may have value for preoperative STAS prediction; however, its predictive performance likely depends on nodule subtype, with pure-solid nodules representing the primary diagnostic challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.