Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42861257›Full record

ArticleClinical optometry2026

Effect of Working Distance on Wesson Card Fixation Disparity and Its Clinical Predictors in Symptomatic Patients.

Thokozile Ingrid Metsing, Gloria Tsholofelo Tamenti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical optometry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thokozile Ingrid MetsingDepartment of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8287-5684
Gloria Tsholofelo TamentiDepartment of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8024-7000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Fixation disparity (FD) is a sensitive marker of binocular vision stress and is often assessed in patients with asthenopia. Working distance alters accommodative and vergence demands. However, its effect on FD under routine clinical settings is not well established. Purpose: To investigate the effect of working distance on FD measured using the Wesson fixation disparity card (WFDC) at 25 cm and 40 cm in symptomatic young adults, and to explore associations with selected binocular vision and accommodative measures. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 25 symptomatic participants aged 18-25 years. FD was measured at 25 cm and 40 cm using the WFDC under standard clinical conditions. Binocular vision and accommodative assessments included near phoria, near point of convergence (NPC), accommodative response (MEM), amplitude of accommodation, and stereoacuity. Paired t-tests were used to compare FD between distances. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and associations were explored using correlation analysis. Results: Mean FD was -3.76 ± 6.63 arcmin at 25 cm and -4.78 ± 7.20 arcmin at 40 cm, with no significant difference between distances (p = 0.20). A strong positive correlation (r = 0.84) and good agreement (ICC = 0.84) were observed, although the limits of agreement were relatively wide. No significant associations were found between FD and clinical measures. Conclusion: FD is a sensitive indicator of binocular stress, often assessed in asthenopic patients. While working distance affects accommodation and vergence demands, its impact on FD in clinical practice remains unclear.

Indexed as

asthenopiabinocular visioncomputer vision syndromefixation disparityWesson cardworking distance

Identifiers

PMID42861257
PMCPMC13654258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.