ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2026
Baseline HbA1c is associated with glycemic response to digital personalized nutrition in type 2 diabetes: A real-world study.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Digital personalized nutrition is increasingly implemented in type 2 diabetes care, but the therapeutic effects appear to be heterogeneous in real-world settings. The aims of this study were to evaluate variations in the glycemic response to a digital personalized dietary intervention and identify baseline determinants of treatment effectiveness. Methods: In this prospective real-world before-after study, 47 adult outpatients with type 2 diabetes received individualized dietary recommendations generated by a web-based platform, with unchanged pharmacotherapy. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), dietary intake, and body mass index were assessed at baseline and after 2-3 months. Subgroup analyses were performed according to baseline HbA1c (<7.0% vs ≥ 7.0%). Results: The intervention was associated with significant reductions in energy intake and body mass index. The overall change in HbA1c at the population level was modest, but a pronounced and statistically significant reduction was observed in patients with baseline HbA1c ≥ 7.0% ( Conclusions: Digital personalized nutrition in routine clinical practice resulted in heterogeneous glycemic effects rather than a uniform population-level response. Clinically meaningful improvement was primarily observed in patients with elevated baseline HbA1c, supporting a targeted implementation strategy and highlighting the importance of patient stratification in digital dietary interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.