ArticleCJC open2026
Natural Language Processing for Risk Stratification of Emergency Department Patients with Chest Pain.
Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Natural language processing can transform unstructured clinical data into actionable insights that optimize workflows, improve patient outcomes, and reduce bias. We created a machine learning model that predicted suspicion of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) based on physician notes and assessed its capability to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) when implemented within the HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin) score. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adults presenting with chest pain to The Ottawa Hospital emergency departments (EDs). GPT-4 produced and extracted 11 binary symptom features from physician-documented history of present illness. An extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classifier was trained on these features to predict ED disposition, a surrogate marker of physician suspicion of ACS (pACS). The resulting natural language processing-derived ACS suspicion score (nACS) replaced the history component of HEART (nHEART) and was compared with the disposition-based composite (pHEART). Results: Of 1011 patients (48.5% female; mean age, 55.7 years), 69 (6.8%) experienced MACE within 6 weeks. nHEART achieved sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 53.8%; pHEART achieved sensitivity and specificity of 95.7% and 69.1%, respectively. pACS and troponin were the strongest multivariable predictors. GPT-4o extraction showed Fleiss' kappa > 0.8 across runs and Cohen's kappa > 0.6 vs extraction by research assistants. Conclusions: Large language models can extract structured symptom features from ED notes, and an XGBoost model trained on these features can reproduce a coarse measure of physician suspicion of ACS. Clinical deployment will require further model training and testing against a prospectively documented measure of physician ACS suspicion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.