Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42861239›Full record

ArticleCJC open2026

Natural Language Processing for Risk Stratification of Emergency Department Patients with Chest Pain.

Reza Valimoradi, George Cao, Allen Ding, Cristian Toarta, Seung Ho Lee, David Le Nguyen, Alexandra Wudwud, Preeti Gupta, Phuong Anh Iris Nguyen, Bahareh Ghaedi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Reza ValimoradiUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
George CaoUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Allen DingPublic Service Commission of Canada, Canada.
Cristian ToartaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Seung Ho LeeDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David Le NguyenDepartment of Family Medicine, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga Hospital, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Alexandra WudwudUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Preeti GuptaOttawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Phuong Anh Iris NguyenOttawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Bahareh GhaediOttawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan Yu-Meng LiUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Venkatesh ThiruganasambandamoorthyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Natural language processing can transform unstructured clinical data into actionable insights that optimize workflows, improve patient outcomes, and reduce bias. We created a machine learning model that predicted suspicion of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) based on physician notes and assessed its capability to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) when implemented within the HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin) score. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adults presenting with chest pain to The Ottawa Hospital emergency departments (EDs). GPT-4 produced and extracted 11 binary symptom features from physician-documented history of present illness. An extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classifier was trained on these features to predict ED disposition, a surrogate marker of physician suspicion of ACS (pACS). The resulting natural language processing-derived ACS suspicion score (nACS) replaced the history component of HEART (nHEART) and was compared with the disposition-based composite (pHEART). Results: Of 1011 patients (48.5% female; mean age, 55.7 years), 69 (6.8%) experienced MACE within 6 weeks. nHEART achieved sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 53.8%; pHEART achieved sensitivity and specificity of 95.7% and 69.1%, respectively. pACS and troponin were the strongest multivariable predictors. GPT-4o extraction showed Fleiss' kappa > 0.8 across runs and Cohen's kappa > 0.6 vs extraction by research assistants. Conclusions: Large language models can extract structured symptom features from ED notes, and an XGBoost model trained on these features can reproduce a coarse measure of physician suspicion of ACS. Clinical deployment will require further model training and testing against a prospectively documented measure of physician ACS suspicion.

Indexed as

HEART scorenatural language processingrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID42861239
PMCPMC13654384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.