ArticleCJC open2026
Prognostic Impact of a Simple GDMT Score on Clinical Outcomes and Cardiac Reverse Remodelling in Patients with ADHF: Insights from the JROADHF-Next Registry.
Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reported results indicate that implementation rates of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) are associated with improved prognosis and cardiac function in heart failure (HF) patients. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between what we term a "simple GDMT score" calculated at discharge and subsequent cardiac reverse remodelling and long-term outcomes in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated HF, using data from the Methods: We analyzed 2313 hospitalized patients with HFrEF or HFmrEF, stratifying them into high-score (≥ 5 points) and low-score (< 5 points) groups based on their discharge GDMT score. Results: The high-score group demonstrated a significantly lower risk of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization (hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.76), an association that remained significant following multivariable adjustment (adjusted model: hazard ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval: 0.56-0.88). Furthermore, the high-score group exhibited significantly greater improvements in echocardiographic indices, including absolute changes in left ventricular ejection fraction ( Conclusions: A higher simple GDMT score at discharge is independently associated with better 2-year clinical outcomes and favourable cardiac reverse remodelling in this cohort of HFrEF/HFmrEF patients hospitalized for acute decompensated HF. These findings suggest that a simple assessment of GDMT at discharge may serve as a practical benchmark of discharge medical optimization in routine clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.