ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Integrating Artificial Intelligence Competencies Across the Six ACGME Core Competencies: A Proposed Framework for Graduate Medical Education.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in clinical practice and Graduate Medical Education (GME), AI-specific competencies are not yet explicitly represented as a distinct domain within the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME) six core competency framework. The ACGME's ongoing consideration of AI in its Common Program Requirements revision process signals an emerging recognition of the need to address this gap. Over 1200 FDA-authorized AI medical devices, unregulated generative AI tools in clinical workflows, and a proliferating state legislative landscape create urgent educational needs. We conducted a purposive narrative review of literature addressing AI adoption, documented failures and litigation, regulatory developments, and bioethical frameworks to develop AI-specific learning objectives, milestone language, and assessment strategies mapped to each ACGME competency. We propose the SHARED ethical framework - Stewardship, Humanity, Accountability, Responsiveness, Equity, and Disclosure - as the moral foundation for AI education. We map AI-related capabilities and representative developmental descriptors across the six existing ACGME competency domains and propose corresponding curricular content and assessment approaches. The alternative to systematic, integrated AI training - informal adoption without standards or assessment - poses unacceptable risks to patients, trainees, and the profession. The proposed framework provides a structured foundation for further development and evaluation of AI education within competency-based GME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.