ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Gender Representation in Authorship of Original Research Publications in Medical Student Journals.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the increasing proportion of female medical students globally, women remain a minority of authors in mainstream medical journals. Whether similar differences in gender representation extend to medical student journals (MSJs) remains unknown. In this bibliometric analysis, we explored female author representation in student-authored original research articles published in MSJs over the past decade. Methods: Using a standardized search strategy, we identified English-language MSJs that are currently active and have been continuously operating for ≥10 years. We used a hierarchical approach to determine the likely gender of authors. We analyzed all student-authored original research articles published in the first issue in the years 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018 to determine trends in authorship demographics and publication volume. Results: Seven out of 23 MSJs met the inclusion criteria with a median operation of 21 years (mean 34.9, range 15-102). Students contributed 79.2% (n = 57/72) of original articles (median 7, range 4-23; 50-100% of total articles per journal). Students were significantly more likely than non-students to be first authors (91.2%, p < 0.001). For all MSJs combined, women comprised 50.5% of authors, 56.1% (95% CI: 43.3-68.2%) of first authors, and 47.4% (95% CI: 35.0-60.1%) of last authors, neither of which differed significantly from equal representation of women and men. The proportion of first (p = 0.31) and last (p = 0.78) authors who were women did not change over time. Discussion: Gender representation among MSJ authors did not differ significantly from equal representation for student and first authors, while women made up a smaller share of non-student and last authors - a pattern that more closely resembles the gender differences reported in mainstream medical journals. The smaller gap may reflect either a true narrowing of these differences over time or a cohort effect, whereby current faculty entered academic medicine when women were less well-represented. Future research should further characterize gender representation in MSJ authorship and identify strategies to support continued progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.