Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42861167›Full record

ArticleExploration (Beijing, China)2026

Transforming the Landscape of Drug Innovation in AI Era: AlphaFold 3 and Beyond.

Songlin He, Liangbin Zhou, Xiaoshuai Wang, Chenzhong Li, Cheng Jiang, Rocky S Tuan, Zhong Alan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploration (Beijing, China), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Songlin He *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China.
Liangbin Zhou *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China.
Xiaoshuai WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China.
Chenzhong LiSchool of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shenzhen China.
Cheng JiangSchool of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shenzhen China.
Rocky S TuanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China.
Zhong Alan LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The traditional drug discovery and development (DDD) pipeline has long been characterized by inefficiency and high costs. The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI), especially AI-based toolkits for protein structure and interaction prediction, exemplified by AlphaFold 3 (AF3), promises to reshape the landscape of drug innovation. AF3 advances structural biology by predicting protein structures and their interactions with a range of biomolecules, including nucleic acids, small-molecule ligands, and ions, potentially changing the conventional DDD paradigm, although prediction accuracy varies substantially across these categories. This perspective examines the impact of AF3 on drug target identification and validation, hit identification, lead optimization, and personalized clinical decision-making, while addressing the technical challenges, ethical considerations, and governance implications. Solutions to overcome current limitations are proposed to advance the development of novel therapeutics.

Indexed as

AlphaFold 3artificial intelligencedrug discovery and developmentpersonalized medicineprotein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID42861167
PMCPMC13654186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.