ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
The clinical application of a low-profile stent for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in the middle cerebral artery: a retrospective study of the Atlas stent.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a major cause of ischemic stroke, conferring high recurrence risk especially among East Asian populations. Landmark trials revealed limitations of Wingspan stenting, including restenosis concerns. The low-profile, flexible Neuroform Atlas stent, initially designed for intracranial aneurysms, may be suitable for tortuous intracranial vessels, yet its real-world evidence for middle cerebral artery (MCA)-segment symptomatic ICAS (sICAS) remains insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Neuroform Atlas stent for treating sICAS involving the MCA M1-M2 segment and explore the clinical value of individualized balloon dilation strategies. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 22 consecutive patients with severe sICAS (70-99% stenosis) in the MCA M1-M2 segment, who were treated with the Neuroform Atlas stent at our center between November 2021 and June 2025. The primary endpoints were technical success rate, perioperative complications, and improvement in vascular stenosis immediately after the procedure and at the 6-month follow-up, including the incidence of in-stent restenosis. An exploratory analysis was performed on cases with different balloon dilation strategies. Results: The technical success rate was 100% in all 22 cases, with no perioperative stroke or death. The mean preprocedural stenosis rate was 80.86%±9.82%, which decreased immediately after the procedure to 32.34%±10.36% (P<0.01). Among the 19 patients who completed imaging follow-up, the mean residual stenosis rate at 6 months was 38.43%±21.39%, showing no statistically significant difference compared with the immediate postprocedural value (P>0.05). The restenosis rate was 10.53% (2/19), with both cases being asymptomatic and occurring in Mori type B or C lesions. The multiple balloon dilation group had a higher baseline stenosis degree, but no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in either the immediate postprocedural residual stenosis rate or the 6-month residual stenosis rate. Conclusions: The Neuroform Atlas stent is safe and effective for treating sICAS in the MCA M1-M2 segment. An individualized balloon predilation strategy can optimize immediate lumen reconstruction for complex lesions without significantly affecting long-term patency. The inherent complexity of the lesion itself may be associated with postoperative restenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.