ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
A competition-proven deep learning-based dual-domain framework for low-dose CBCT reconstruction.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Low-dose cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging reduces radiation exposure but inevitably increases noise levels, leading to degradation of reconstructed image quality. This study proposes and systematically evaluates a deep learning-based dual-domain framework, named DLDF, for improving CBCT image quality. The effectiveness of DLDF is demonstrated by its first-place ranking in the low-dose task of the ICASSP-2024 3D-CBCT Challenge. Methods: The proposed DLDF integrates a projection domain model (PDNet), based on a three-dimensional (3D) Res-UNet architecture, with an image domain model (IDNet), based on a two-dimensional (2D) Res-UNet architecture. Low-dose projections were first denoised by PDNet, followed by Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) reconstruction, and then further refined by IDNet. The DLDF was trained on data from 800 patients, validated on 100 patients, and tested on 110 patients. On the validation set, the DLDF was compared with 10 state-of-the-art (SOTA) deep learning methods using five quantitative metrics: mean squared error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), feature similarity (FSIM), structural similarity (SSIM), and visual information fidelity (VIF). Statistical analysis was conducted using the Friedman test, followed by the post-hoc Durbin-Conover test with Holm-Bonferroni correction. On the test set, the DLDF was compared against 8 competing methods submitted by other participants. Results: The proposed DLDF preserved anatomical structures and fine details with notable improvements in overall visual integrity, while also demonstrating improved performance across quantitative metrics. On the validation set, the DLDF achieved average MSE, PSNR, FSIM, SSIM, and VIF values of 0.00162, 35.54 dB, 0.9709, 0.9186, and 0.8492, respectively, outperforming all 10 SOTA methods with statistically significant improvements across all metrics (P<0.05). On the test set, the DLDF achieved an average MSE of 0.00145, ranking first among all competing methods submitted by the participants. Conclusions: The proposed DLDF effectively improves the quality of low-dose CBCT images. By enabling high-quality reconstructions from lower radiation exposures, this framework may help reduce patient dose and associated health risks in clinical CBCT applications. The code is publicly available at: https://github.com/Xuzhi-bjtu/ICASSP-2024-3D-CBCT-challenge-Low-dose-CBCT-reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.