Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42861026›Full record

ArticleGynecology and pelvic medicine2026

Autoamputation of pelvic adnexa: two case reports.

Jinglin Wu, Chaoyan Yuan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jinglin WuDepartment of Gynecology, Minda Hospital of Hubei Minzu University, Enshi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1172-7857
Chaoyan YuanDepartment of Gynecology, Minda Hospital of Hubei Minzu University, Enshi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Parasitic ovarian teratoma is a rare consequence of chronic torsion or auto-amputation of the adnexa. Delayed diagnosis may result in a free-floating pelvic mass without identifiable adnexal tissue. Case Description: Respectively, two young women (23 and 29 years) presented with ignored pelvic pain a few months ago. Both had previously self-medicated with oral analgesics without further treatment. The ultrasound revealed an isolated solid-cystic pelvic mass with absent colour Doppler signals. No normal ipsilateral ovarian or tubal tissue was visualised. Both patients had no positive findings on laboratory tests; their cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels were 7.81 and 11.7 IU/mL, respectively. Diagnosticlaparoscopy was performed. In both cases, the ipsilateral adnexa was completely absent; a pelvic mass was identified, extensively and densely adherent to the anterior abdominal wall and both pelvic sidewalls; after dissecting the adhesion, the mass was freed, with its surface smooth and pedicle-free. The diameters of the masses were 7cm and 8cm, respectively. Histology showed a cyst lined by mature squamous and ciliated columnar epithelium, containing hair shafts, cartilage, adipose tissue, and dilated lymphatics; no immature neural elements were seen, consistent with mature cystic teratoma. Post-operative recovery was uneventful; both patients were discharged on day 5. At the 3-month follow-up, the ultrasound showed normal contralateral adnexa and no recurrence. Conclusions: Chronic adnexal torsion can lead to complete auto-amputation and an isolated pelvic mass. High index of suspicion and early diagnostic laparoscopy are essential in young women with acute or subacute abdominal pain.

Indexed as

adnexal torsionAuto-amputationcase reportparasitic ovarian teratoma

Identifiers

PMID42861026
PMCPMC13653779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.