ReviewGynecology and pelvic medicine2026
Behavioral treatment of urinary incontinence: a guideline-driven narrative review.
Review in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a highly prevalent condition affecting women and men across the lifespan, with substantial clinical, psychosocial, and economic impact on quality of life, functional status, and healthcare utilization. International clinical practice guidelines consistently recommend behavioral and conservative interventions as the primary of first-line strategy for most UI subtypes, including stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI)/overactive bladder (OAB), and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). This narrative review aims to critically synthesize contemporary evidence on behavioral treatment of UI, integrating international guideline recommendations with key primary and secondary literature to support optimal translation into routine clinical care. Methods: A guideline-driven narrative review was conducted based on the most recent recommendations from the European Association of Urology (EAU), the American Urological Association/Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction (AUA/SUFU), and the International Continence Society (ICS). Evidence cited within these guidelines was traced to randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Additional PubMed-indexed studies were included to address special populations, evolving models of care delivery, and implementation barriers. The literature reviewed was published predominantly between 2005 and 2025 and limited to English-language sources. Key Content and Findings: Behavioral interventions-including pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), bladder training, timed or prompted voiding, urgency suppression strategies, lifestyle modification, and structured patient education-demonstrate robust and clinically meaningful improvements in symptom burden and health-related quality of life across UI phenotypes. PFMT remains the central evidence-based intervention for SUI in women and post-prostatectomy incontinence in men, whereas bladder training and urgency suppression strategies are core components of UUI/OAB management. In older adults, frail individuals, and cognitively impaired populations, multicomponent and caregiver-supported behavioral programs are particularly effective and feasible. Emerging telehealth and digital delivery platforms show promise in improving access, adherence, and scalability, although long-term effectiveness and comparative implementation data are still needed. Conclusions: Behavioral therapy provides a safe, effective, and highly adaptable foundation for UI management across diverse populations and care settings. Despite heterogeneity in study design, intervention protocols, and outcome reporting, international guidelines consistently endorse conservative strategies as first-line treatment. Future research should prioritize intervention standardization, harmonized outcome frameworks, inclusion of underrepresented groups, and integration of implementation science and digital health innovations to maximize long-term effectiveness and global uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.