Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42860997›Full record

ReviewAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2026

A review on applying immunological methods in animal research.

Jossie M Santamaria, Gisela F Erf

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jossie M SantamariaDepartment of Poultry Science, Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville 72701, AR, USA.
Gisela F ErfDepartment of Poultry Science, Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville 72701, AR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on animal nutrition, including the impact of diets on immune system development and function, continues to expand our understanding of nutritional immunology to improve animal health and performance. From the perspective of research conducted in mammalian and avian immunology, this manuscript highlights species-appropriate approaches for performing immune assessments in experimental animals. Emphasis is placed on the importance of basic immunology knowledge, attention to detail to avoid flawed experiments, and precision in reporting and interpreting results to avoid incorrect conclusions and health recommendations. Animal nutritionists who incorporate immunological approaches into their research must use standardized procedures, validated tools, appropriate controls, and collaborate closely with immunologists to gather valid, reliable immunological insights from their studies. Topics addressed include the uses of peripheral blood analysis as a window into systemic immune system activities, along with methodological approaches ranging from establishing profiles of circulating leukocyte populations to leukocyte isolation methods and commonly used procedures to gain insight into their functional capabilities. By highlighting the differences in mammalian and avian procedures, researchers will also be made aware of potential pitfalls when working with other animal species. For example, white blood cells in birds and fish also include thrombocytes that may make up the majority of white blood cells but are not considered part of the immune cell populations (lymphocytes, neutrophils [heterophils in birds], monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils) in the blood. The methodologies described for blood are also applicable to immune system-related studies in tissues (e.g., lymphoid organs and sites of inflammation, etc.), including establishment of leukocyte profiles and leukocyte isolation for in vitro assessment. In addition to in vitro assays, methodologies to assess cell-mediated immunity in vivo are addressed. These include using the skin as a window into responses taking place in a complex tissue. Among characteristic skin swelling responses following intradermal injection of antigens or immunostimulants, the unique in vivo growing feather pulp bioassay in poultry is highlighted, as it is a minimally invasive procedure that enables assessment of local tissue/cellular immune responses across time in an individual without invasive surgical procedure or euthanization of the birds. Overall, the objective is to assist nutritionists and animal health researchers in implementing and integrating scientifically sound immunological approaches and considerations in research studies to acquire important insights that will further expand knowledge in nutritional immunology.

Indexed as

Immunology approachImmunology methodNutritionNutritional immunologyPoultry

Identifiers

PMID42860997
PMCPMC13653993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.