ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
The development and preliminary validation of a multidimensional assessment scale for loneliness in nursing homes.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Loneliness among nursing home residents is a multidimensional and subjective experience associated with adverse health outcomes. Existing instruments often fail to capture this complexity and are poorly adapted to cognitively impaired populations in institutional care settings. Objectives: To create a multidimensional, cognitively accessible assessment scale for loneliness in nursing home residents, grounded in residents' experiences and suitable for use in routine care. Design: Sequential multi method study following the initial stages of scale development as outlined by Boateng et al. (2018). Settings: Multiple nursing home settings in the Netherlands represent long-term care environments for frail older adults. Participants: Nursing home residents were purposively selected to reflect variation in cognitive functioning, including individuals with no cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment, and moderate to severe cognitive impairment. Participants were included if they could engage in an interview to some extent; residents with acute distress or an inability to participate in any form of communication were excluded Methods: Item development followed three steps: (1) generation of items and recommendations based on literature and residents' experiences; (2) expert consultation to establish content validity and refine wording; and (3) pre-testing through semi-structured cognitive interviews (Willis, 2004) to assess comprehension and feasibility. Results: The final scale comprises 14 items selected from an initial pool of 22. The instrument captures social, emotional, existential, and institution-specific dimensions of loneliness. Although comprehension was lower among residents with severe cognitive impairment, overall understanding across participants was sufficient to retain all items. Cognitive testing demonstrated that residents, including those with moderate to severe dementia, were able to meaningfully reflect on the items when appropriately supported. The assessment procedure was found to be practical, inclusive, and minimally burdensome, and facilitated discussion of residents lived experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.