ReviewGynecology and pelvic medicine2026
The pelvic floor: myth or hype?-a narrative review.
Review in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The pelvic floor represents a complex, dynamic neuromuscular structure integral to urinary, bowel, and sexual function. Despite its fundamental role, pelvic floor dysfunction remains under-recognised in both diagnosis and management within urology and gynaecology. Traditional perspectives have often confined its clinical relevance to stress urinary incontinence (SUI), overlooking its contribution to voiding dysfunction, chronic pelvic pain (CPP), sexual dysfunction (SD), and functional bladder outlet obstruction (FBOO). This narrative review aims to examine the pelvic floor as a central determinant of functional pelvic health rather than an adjunctive consideration. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed and Elsevier platforms, supplemented by targeted searches of national clinical guideline repositories, including the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Searches incorporated Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free text terms related to pelvic floor dysfunction, pelvic floor muscle training, chronic pelvic pain, voiding dysfunction, sexual dysfunction and neuromodulatory therapies. English language studies involving adult populations published between January 1 Key Content and Findings: Evidence demonstrates both hypotonic and hypertonic pelvic floor states are clinically significant. Pelvic floor muscle hypertonicity is strongly associated with CPP, dysfunctional voiding and dyspareunia, while reduced pelvic strength contributes to incontinence and prolapse. High-quality evidence supports supervised pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), with or without adjuncts such as biofeedback for managing postpartum SUI. Emerging data support relaxation-based pelvic floor rehabilitation and neuromodulatory interventions. Conclusions: The "phantom floor" is neither myth nor a clinical afterthought but a vital foundation of female pelvic health. Standardised functional assessment pathways, multidisciplinary approach and targeted therapy are the cornerstone for appropriate management of pelvic floor dysfunctions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.