ReviewGynecology and pelvic medicine2026
Bacterial vaginosis: a narrative review of concepts and best practices.
Review in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a multifaceted condition characterized by an imbalance of the vaginal microbiota. This disruption includes not only Methods: We conducted a search on MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Google Scholar, and Scopus for publications in English, prior to September 2025, using the keywords [vaginal microbiota] OR [vaginal microbiome] OR [vaginosis] OR [bacterial vaginosis] OR [dysbiosis] AND [vagina] AND [diagnosis] AND [treatment]. We also reviewed the references of the articles obtained through our literature searches. Key Content and Findings: BV is characterized by a shift from aerobic to anaerobic microbiota. Anaerobic bacteria and their metabolites can significantly impact the local immune response, resulting in various complications in women's reproductive health. Although most affected individuals remain asymptomatic, dysbiosis may negatively influence pregnancy outcomes and elevate the risk of sexually transmitted infections. Diagnosis is traditionally based on the Amsel criteria and Nugent Score. More recently, nucleic acid amplification tests, particularly those utilizing multiplex platforms, have been implemented to identify bacterial species such as Conclusions: BV has long been recognized, and diagnosis has traditionally been based on Amsel's criteria and Nugent's score. While new diagnostic tools have offered valuable insights, they have also introduced new questions about this complex condition. Metronidazole remains the primary treatment, although adjuvant therapies, such as biofilm disruption and probiotics, are often required. Further large-scale, in-depth studies are needed to address ongoing uncertainties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.