Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42860941›Full record

ReviewJournal of visualized surgery2026

Transitioning from direct vision to totally endoscopic minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Tommaso Hinna Danesi, Edoardo Zancanaro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of visualized surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tommaso Hinna DanesiDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Edoardo ZancanaroDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0259-0844

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has evolved significantly over the past two decades, shifting from conventional median sternotomy toward sternal-sparing approaches that offer reduced surgical trauma, lower complication rates, and faster patient recovery. As incision size has progressively decreased, the field has advanced toward totally endoscopic cardiac surgery (TECS), in which the entire intracardiac procedure is performed exclusively under thoracoscopic visualization. Despite growing adoption, the transition from direct-vision MICS to TECS remains technically demanding and operationally complex. Drawing on our institutional experience at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and a review of the current literature, we provide a comprehensive overview of the key elements required to successfully build and sustain a TECS program. These include a working definition of totally endoscopic surgery, a proposed four-phase surgeon training pathway, simulation-based learning strategies, robotic credentialing, team-based training, technical instrumentation, scope management, patient selection criteria, procedural challenges, and postoperative outcomes. Both non-robotic and robotic-assisted endoscopic platforms are discussed. Large-scale evidence confirms that MICS and TECS achieve outcomes equivalent or superior to sternotomy, with low mortality and stroke rates, and significantly improved health-related quality of life. Notably, non-robotic TECS offers a scalable and cost-effective pathway that does not require an expert bedside assistant, can address multiple pathologies simultaneously, and is feasible across diverse healthcare settings. Emerging technologies-including articulated robotic instruments, artificial intelligence-enhanced imaging, and next-generation robotic platforms-are expected to further expand the reach and safety of fully endoscopic cardiac procedures.

Indexed as

minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS)mitral valverobotic cardiac surgerysurgeon trainingTotally endoscopic cardiac surgery (TECS)

Identifiers

PMID42860941
PMCPMC13653785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.