ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2026
Neurological Manifestations in Whipple's Disease: A Scoping Review of Clinical Features, Laboratory Findings, and Neuroimaging Characteristics of 111 Cases.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhipple disease (WD) is a rare, potentially fatal infection caused by Tropheryma whipplei (TW). Central Nervous System involvement (CNS-WD) is a severe complication of WD with a challenging diagnosis, due to limited data integrating neurological features, imaging, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, PCR, and intestinal histopathology. Prompt recognition and treatment are essential to improve patient outcomes.
methodsA scoping review of the literature from 2000 to 2025 was conducted, including all CNS-WD case reports and series, to outline its clinical spectrum and diagnostic workup.
resultsIncluded studies were 89, accounting for 111 CNS-WD cases. Most patients were male (79.8%), with a mean age of 53.6 years. Notably, 13.2% presented with CNS involvement in the absence of systemic WD. Pathognomonic signs were rare (13/111, 11.7%). Most patients (82.9%, 92/111) presented with two or more neurological symptoms, the most frequently reported being altered mentation, followed by ataxia, eye movement abnormalities, and other movement disorders. CSF was abnormal in 74.7% (56/75) of patients and TW PCR was positive in 75% (48/64); 64% (55/86) of cases showed intestinal histopathology consistent with WD. TW PCR on gastrointestinal biopsies was positive in 67.9% (19/28) cases. CNS imaging revealed abnormalities in 85.4% (82/96) of patients, with no distinctive pattern.
conclusionsCNS-WD diagnosis remains challenging due to nonspecific symptoms, variable imaging, and occasional discordance among CSF, TW PCR or biopsy findings. Our review suggests that CNS-WD should be considered in the differential diagnosis of unexplained neurological syndromes, even in patients with atypical clinical or radiological profiles, supporting broader indications for TW testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.