Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42860829›Full record

Trial reportPain research & management2026

Dual-Wavelength Laser Therapy for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Sham-Controlled Trial.

Sandra Franco, Cesar Lara, Kirk Gair, Kerry Zang, Jaime Franco, Steve Shanks, Travis Sammons

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain research & management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05291975 (Clinical Efficacy and Human Factors Validation Testing for Prescription Home Use of the Erchonia Corporation EVRL™ for Providing Temporary Relief of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Foot Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05291975 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Efficacy and Human Factors Validation Testing for Prescription Home Use of the Erchonia Corporation EVRL™ for Providing Temporary Relief of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Foot Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorErchonia CorporationRan2022 to 2024Enrolled64ConditionsNeuropathy, Diabetic, Neuropathy, Peripheral, Neuropathy, PainfulArmsErchonia® EVRL™, Placebo Laser
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sandra FrancoFranco & Co-Podiatric Medicine & Surgery, Miramar, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0497-4031
Cesar LaraWeight Loss & Wellness, Dunedin, Florida, USA.
Kirk GairLaser Chiropractic, West Covina, California, USA.
Kerry ZangRegenerative Foot & Ankle Medicine, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Jaime FrancoFranco & Co-Podiatric Medicine & Surgery, Miramar, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2713-5560
Steve ShanksErchonia Corporation, Fountain Inn, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3163-3513
Travis SammonsErchonia Corporation, Fountain Inn, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4047-481X

Funding

Erchonia Corporation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPainful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is common and often inadequately controlled with pharmacological therapy. This study evaluated a clinician-directed, prescription home-use dual-wavelength low-level laser therapy device for temporary relief of painful DPN.

methodsIn this prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial conducted at four independent U.S. clinical sites, 64 adults with painful DPN were randomized 1:1 to active treatment (n = 33) or sham treatment (n = 31). The active device emitted simultaneous 640 red and 405 nm violet coherent laser light. Participants self-administered treatment twice daily for 3 weeks, with each session consisting of 5 min per foot. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants achieving at least a 30% reduction in visual analog scale (VAS) foot pain score from baseline to Week 3. Secondary outcomes included VAS change, neuropathic pain symptoms, treatment satisfaction, durability through Week 7, adherence, blinding integrity, and safety. Participants were required to maintain a stable analgesic and neuropathic-pain regimen throughout, so the intervention was delivered in addition to existing standard care. The primary endpoint was analyzed in the intent-to-treat population, with single imputation for the four participants who withdrew before receiving a device.

resultsAt Week 3, 72.7% of active-treated participants met the primary responder criterion compared with 32.3% of sham-treated participants, a between-group difference of 40.5 percentage points (95% CI 18.1 to 62.9) (p = 0.0024). Mean VAS reduction was greater with active treatment than sham treatment (-33.4 vs -20.0 points; p = 0.026). Improvements were sustained through Week 7, with favorable symptom trends, higher satisfaction, and no serious device-related adverse events. Improvement on the neuropathic pain symptom inventory was greatest for paresthesia/dysesthesia, paroxysmal pain, and burning pain and was not evident for evoked pain.

interpretationPrescription home-use dual-wavelength laser therapy was well tolerated and produced clinically meaningful short-term reductions in foot pain in adults with painful DPN at four independent clinical sites. Because assessment ended four weeks after treatment completion, the findings support short-term pain relief, and the intervention is best positioned as a complementary, nonpharmacological modality used alongside standard care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05291975.

Indexed as

Diabetic NeuropathiesLaser TherapyLow-Level Light TherapyAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesTreatment Outcomediabetic peripheral neuropathyhome-use devicelow-level laser therapyneuropathic painphotobiomodulationrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID42860829
PMCPMC13655509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.