ArticleACR open rheumatology2026
Real-World Use of Avacopan in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: Early and Long-Term Clinical, Renal, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in an Italian Rheumatology-Nephrology Network.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveComplement activation, particularly through the C5a-C5a receptor axis, plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) and may represent an important therapeutic target. Avacopan, an oral C5a receptor antagonist, was the first therapy targeting this pathway to enter in clinical practice. Prospective real-world data on its long-term effectiveness, safety, and impact on quality of life (QoL) remain limited. In the context of an evolving therapeutic and regulatory landscape, such data provide valuable evidence on the clinical effects of C5a receptor inhibition and may inform the development and evaluation of future complement-targeted therapies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness, safety, kidney outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes of avacopan in an Italian cohort of patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA).
methodsThis prospective, multicenter, observational study included patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing GPA or MPA who were started on avacopan therapy across 18 Italian centers. Avacopan was administered in combination with standard immunosuppressive therapy, with or without glucocorticoids (GCs). Clinical remission (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score = 0), GC-free remission, kidney parameters, laboratory outcomes, adverse events, and patient-reported outcomes assessed by the AAV Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaire were evaluated up to 52 weeks and beyond. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the European Kidney Function Consortium equation.
resultsForty-six patients were included (63% women; mean age of 59 years); 61% had relapsing disease, and 70% had kidney involvement at baseline. Clinical remission was achieved by 78%, 88%, and 97% of patients at weeks 12, 26, and 52, respectively. GC-free remission occurred in 20% at week 12 and 55% at week 52. Mean GC dose decreased from 23 mg/day at baseline to 5 mg/day by week 12 (P < 0.001). Kidney function improved over time, with median eGFR increasing from 30.5 mL/min/1.73 m
conclusionIn this real-world Italian cohort, patients treated with avacopan achieved high remission rates, substantial GC reduction, improvement in kidney function, and sustained QoL benefits. These findings provide prospective real-world evidence on the clinical outcomes associated with C5a receptor inhibition in routine clinical practice while acknowledging the observational design of the study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.