ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
LLMs as Representation Generators for Gradient-Free Scientific Optimization: A Case Study in Battery Fast Charging.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scientific optimization problems are often characterized by slow, expensive, and non-differentiable evaluations, which severely limit efficient exploration of rich design spaces. In these settings, performance depends not only on the optimizer itself, but also on whether the chosen search space can represent good solutions and whether important design requirements are effectively incorporated into the search. Here, we introduce a gradient-free optimization framework based on large language models (LLMs) that enables the generation and refinement of executable control policies directly from natural language. We propose two complementary paradigms: Prompt-to-Optimizer (P2O), which combines LLM-based structural generation with gradient-free parameter optimization, and Prompt-to-Protocol (P2P), which directly synthesizes fully specified control policies. We apply this framework to battery fast-charging protocol design, a representative slow-feedback optimization problem. Across multiple case studies, our methods outperform conventional approaches restricted to predefined functional forms. In a realistic fast-charging scenario, both approaches improve battery state of health by approximately 4.2% over a representative baseline, with P2P achieving this under matched evaluation budgets. More broadly, our results suggest that LLMs can serve as representation generators that expand the hypothesis space of scientific optimization, enabling efficient search in domains where evaluations are costly, and gradients are unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.