ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Textbook outcome-based performance assessment during transition to the da Vinci SP system in reduced-port robotic gastrectomy.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although reduced-port gastrectomy with the da Vinci SP system offers a dedicated single-port platform, little is known about how an experienced robotic surgeon performs while changing platforms. We examined this transition by applying cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis to textbook outcome (TO). We retrospectively analyzed 175 consecutive reduced-port robotic gastrectomies performed at a tertiary referral center from July 2021 through August 2025. The primary measure was TO, a composite of six perioperative requirements. Case-sequence performance was examined with CUSUM curves for TO and operative time. Among 175 patients, 164 achieved TO (93.7%; 95% CI, 89.1-96.5%) and 168 achieved adjusted TO (aTO; 96.0%); major complications occurred in 1.7%. The TO-CUSUM curve showed an apparent stabilization after approximately 60 cases, whereas operative-time CUSUM reached its observed nadir at case 107. The later period included more D2 dissections and complex procedures; the TO rate was 96.7% in the early period and 92.2% in the late period. During transition to the da Vinci SP platform, TO-based CUSUM provided a longitudinal description of perioperative quality as case selection and procedural complexity evolved. The distinct TO-CUSUM and operative-time CUSUM trajectories suggest that quality-related performance and procedural efficiency may evolve at different rates during platform transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42860515What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.