ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Force feedback and vocal cord dysfunction after robotic esophagectomy: a comparison of the da Vinci 5 and Xi systems.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The da Vinci 5 (DV5) is the first robotic platform to integrate force feedback (FFB), which may limit excessive traction and tissue injury. Its clinical impact in robotic transthoracic esophagectomy remains unclear. We compared perioperative outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and DV5 systems. This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent robotic transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by a single high-volume surgeon between December 2024 and July 2026. Patients treated with the Xi system without FFB (n = 126) and the DV5 system with FFB (n = 37) were compared. Vocal cord dysfunction (palsy or hypomobility) was assessed by routine postoperative laryngoscopy. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) as a sensitivity analysis. Vocal cord dysfunction was less frequent in the DV5 group (Xi, 33.3% vs. DV5, 13.5%), and the association persisted after multivariable and IPTW adjustment (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.33; IPTW OR, 0.27). Vocal cord palsy was also less frequent (27.8% vs. 10.8%), although the difference was not significant after adjustment. In an exploratory analysis, overall 30-day complications were less frequent in the DV5 group (74.6% vs. 54.1%; adjusted OR, 0.43), but the difference was attenuated after IPTW adjustment. Total and recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node yields did not differ. DV5 with integrated FFB was associated with less frequent vocal cord dysfunction and comparable operative outcomes. These findings may provide the first clinical data suggesting FFB could reduce traction-related nerve injury in robotic esophagectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42860481What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.