ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2026
Multivariate Analysis of Data From Crossover Clinical Trials.
Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In crossover designs, multiple outcomes are often collected to assess treatment effectiveness in a comprehensive manner. Also, interest has grown in comparing intra-subject variability between treatments in such designs. We present three distinct multivariate linear mixed-effects models, with the choice of the model depending on the design and assumptions regarding carryover effects. We discuss maximum likelihood (ML) and restricted ML (REML) approaches for parameter estimation. For a special case that a crossover design is uniform within sequences, we derive the closed-form expressions for the ML and REML estimators of the variance components. We propose general hypothesis testing methods for the treatment effects and the intra-subject variance matrices. The latter situation has not received much attention in the statistical literature. For the special case, we derive the exact test statistics for treatment means comparisons and for testing the null hypothesis of homogeneous intra-subject variance matrices. Simulation studies are conducted to validate the superior performance of the proposed multivariate approach compared with the usual univariate approach in testing treatment effects. Finally, we apply the methodologies to two data examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.