ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Lymph node yield and station count in early robot-assisted versus established video-assisted resection for non-small cell lung cancer: higher total node counts reflect yield per sampled station.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whether robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) improves nodal staging over video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) early in adoption is unknown. We compared occult nodal upstaging and lymph node (LN) retrieval between early RATS and an established VATS practice by one surgeon, and asked whether total LN count reflects the number of stations sampled. Retrospective single-surgeon cohort of consecutive lung cancer resections with systematic LN dissection (2023-2026). Primary outcome: occult nodal upstaging (pathologic N + in clinically N0 patients). Secondary outcomes: LN yield, distinct stations sampled, and yield per sampled station, and perioperative outcomes. Eighty-seven patients qualified (RATS, n = 49; VATS, n = 38; 92.1% of VATS operations after RATS introduction). Occult upstaging was 10.6% vs. 10.5% (95% CI for the difference, - 14.8 to + 13.7% points; not significant). Total LN yield was higher with VATS (13.8 vs. 17.7; p = 0.018), whereas stations sampled were similar (4.7 vs. 4.7; equivalent within post-hoc margins of ± 1 and ± 0.75 but not ± 0.5 stations); yield per sampled station was lower with RATS (2.5 vs. 3.3; p = 0.001), mostly in mediastinal stations. This did not attenuate across the 49 RATS cases and persisted after multivariable adjustment (rate ratio 1.29; 95% CI 1.04-1.60). Operative time was longer with RATS; complications and R0 resection did not differ. No significant difference in occult upstaging was observed, but the study was underpowered and this result is inconclusive. Higher VATS node counts reflected yield per sampled station rather than more stations, for reasons that could not be determined. Station-level yield should be reported alongside total node count.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42860470What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.