Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42860453›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2026

Polish Validation of the Views of Suffering Scale: Factorial Structure, Psychometric Properties and Clinical Applications.

Radosław Rybarski, Kamil Tomaka, Joshua A Wilt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Radosław RybarskiThe John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Aleje Raclawickie 14, 20-950, Lublin, Poland. radoslaw.rybarski@kul.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5428-4585
Kamil TomakaThe John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Aleje Raclawickie 14, 20-950, Lublin, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9704-9051
Joshua A WiltCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7059-6389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Religious beliefs about the causes and meaning of human suffering remain understudied despite their potential relevance to psychological and spiritual functioning. To address this gap, we adapted the Views of Suffering Scale (VOSS) for use with Polish samples. Across three studies, we examined the psychometric properties and clinical correlates of the Polish VOSS. Study 1 (N = 565) tested the internal structure using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA); Study 2 (N = 219) examined convergent and discriminant validity; and Study 3 (N = 346) explored associations with indicators of psychological well-being and distress. Results supported a multidimensional ten-factor structure consistent with the original scale, with acceptable reliability and satisfactory construct validity. Benevolent views of suffering were positively associated with religious commitment, perceived divine engagement, and life satisfaction. In contrast, non-benevolent views were associated with lower religious commitment and higher levels of stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and religious/spiritual struggles. Overall, the findings suggest that the Polish VOSS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing diverse beliefs about suffering and their associations with religious, psychological, and spiritual functioning.

Indexed as

MeasurementReligious beliefsScale developmentSufferingTheodicy

Identifiers

PMID42860453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.