Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42860447›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Visual field asymmetry indices and optical coherence tomography in the differential diagnosis of glaucomatous and pituitary adenoma-related optic neuropathies.

Turan Akbalık, Şeyda Karadeniz Uğurlu, Güzide Gonca Örük

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Turan AkbalıkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, 35200, Türkiye. dr.turanakbalik@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4342-8472
Şeyda Karadeniz UğurluDepartment of Ophthalmology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, 35200, Türkiye.
Güzide Gonca ÖrükDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, 35200, İzmir, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDifferentiating glaucomatous optic neuropathy from compressive optic neuropathy related to pituitary adenomas remains challenging, particularly in patients with mild visual field loss, as structural OCT findings and functional deficits may substantially overlap.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 178 eyes of 178 participants with primary open-angle glaucoma, pituitary macroadenomas, pituitary microadenomas, and healthy controls. All subjects underwent standard automated perimetry using the 24 - 2 SITA Standard strategy and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). Structural parameters included peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) measurements, and the macular naso-temporal ratio (mNTR). Functional asymmetry was assessed using the temporal-to-nasal ratio (TNR), superior-to-inferior ratio (SIR), and an extended Simple Temporal Depression Index (eSTDI), adapted from the original STDI to reduce point-specific variability by sampling a broader region along the vertical meridian. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

resultsPeripapillary RNFL and macular GCIPL analyses demonstrated characteristic but overlapping structural patterns between glaucoma and macroadenoma groups, whereas no significant structural abnormalities were observed in the microadenoma group compared with controls. The mNTR showed limited discriminatory ability across group comparisons. By contrast, visual field-based asymmetry indices, particularly eSTDI, demonstrated strong diagnostic performance, while structural OCT parameters and functional indices provided complementary diagnostic information across different group comparisons. The eSTDI effectively differentiated glaucoma, macroadenoma, and microadenoma groups from healthy controls but showed limited ability to distinguish glaucoma from macroadenoma. Importantly, patients with pituitary microadenomas exhibited significant functional visual field abnormalities compared with controls despite the absence of corresponding structural abnormalities on OCT.

conclusionsVisual field-based functional asymmetry indices, particularly eSTDI, may help identify abnormal visual pathway involvement in early or subtle disease, especially when structural OCT findings are inconclusive. Nevertheless, structural OCT remains essential for the topographic assessment of RNFL and GCIPL damage. While eSTDI reliably identifies abnormal functional patterns, its discriminatory capacity is reduced when disease entities exhibit similar levels of functional impairment. These findings support an integrated multimodal approach in which structural OCT and visual field-based asymmetry indices provide complementary information in the differential diagnosis of glaucomatous and compressive optic neuropathies.

Indexed as

GlaucomaOptical coherence tomography (OCT)Pituitary adenomaVisual fields

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.