Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42860286›Full record

ArticleWomen's health nursing (Seoul, Korea)2026

Factors associated with intention to undergo elective oocyte cryopreservation among unmarried nurses in South Korea: a cross-sectional study.

Danbi Oh, Moonjeong Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Danbi OhRehabilitation Medicine Ward, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Moonjeong KimDepartment of Nursing, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study examined intention to undergo elective oocyte cryopreservation (EOC) among unmarried nurses younger than 40 years and identified factors associated with EOC intention.

methodsThis descriptive correlational study used a cross-sectional survey design and was conducted from September 12 to September 30, 2025 at a tertiary hospital in Busan, South Korea. The participants were 159 unmarried nurses. Attitudes toward EOC, procedural burden, ethical concerns, health-related concerns, and EOC knowledge were measured using a modified Fertility Preservation Survey. EOC intentions were assessed using a visual analog scale. Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed.

resultsParticipants reported a moderate level of EOC intention. EOC intention differed significantly by age, with nurses in their 20s reporting higher scores than those in their 30s (t=3.19, p=.002). EOC intention was positively correlated with attitudes toward EOC (r=.53, p<.001) and negatively correlated with health-related concerns (r=-.26, p=.001). In multiple linear regression analysis, greater EOC intention was significantly associated with more positive attitudes toward EOC (β=.47, p<.001), lower health-related concerns (β=-.23, p=.003), and younger age (β=-.21, p=.009). The model explained 32.0% of the variance.

conclusionEarly, evidence-based education and counseling that strengthen positive attitudes toward EOC and directly address health-related concerns may help unmarried nurses make informed reproductive decisions.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCryopreservationFertility PreservationIntentionNursesOocytesSingle PersonAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansRepublic of KoreaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttitudeCryopreservationDecision makingNursesOocytes

Identifiers

PMID42860286
PMCPMC13654684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.