Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42860283›Full record

ArticleWomen's health nursing (Seoul, Korea)2026

"I did it": a phenomenological study of women's experiences of midwife-supported vaginal birth after cesarean sections in South Korea.

Uri Bang, Hyun Kyoung Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Uri BangDepartment of Nursing, Kongju National University, Gongju, Korea.
Hyun Kyoung KimDepartment of Nursing, Kongju National University, Gongju, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study explored the meaning of women's choices regarding mode of birth and the birth experiences of women in the Republic of Korea who had a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) within the previous 3 months.

methodsThis descriptive phenomenological study used Colaizzi's framework. Nine postpartum women who had experienced midwife-supported VBAC at three obstetric hospitals in Seoul were recruited through purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews from March 1, 2025, to May 7, 2026. Each participant completed a videoconference interview, and two participants completed an additional telephone interview. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step method, including extraction of significant statements, formulation of meanings, organization into themes, and member checking of the essential structure.

resultsThree categories and 12 theme clusters were identified: "Trauma and lasting impressions of cesarean delivery," "Motives and barriers affecting VBAC decisions," and "Supportive relationships and transformation of the birth experience." Respect for autonomy, a positive birth environment, and family support helped transform birth from an experience of alienation to one of participation. The statement "I did it" expressed a sense of accomplishment and recovery of the agency participants felt they had lost during previous births.

conclusionThis study suggests that, for these participants, VBAC involved more than a choice of mode of birth; it was experienced as a process of rewriting the birth narrative and recovering agency and self-efficacy. These findings may inform midwives and nurses seeking to understand and support the psychosocial experiences of women pursuing VBAC.

Indexed as

MidwiferyVaginal Birth after CesareanAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchRepublic of KoreaMidwiferyNatural childbirthPostpartum periodQualitative researchVaginal birth after cesarean

Identifiers

PMID42860283
PMCPMC13654676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.