Trial reportJournal of animal science2026
Effect of physically effective fiber on animal growth performance, carcass characteristics, digestibility, and rumination in finishing beef cattle.
Trial report in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the effects of altering dietary peNDF concentration by modifying forage particle size on digestibility, rumination, and performance of finishing beef steers. Forty crossbred beef steers (initial BW = 387 ± 38.2 kg) were blocked by BW and assigned to 10 pens with 4 steers per pen. Pens were then randomly assigned to one of two dietary treatments (n = 5 pens per treatment; 4 steers per pen). Diets were formulated identically, differing only in forage particle size. Prairie hay was processed through a commercial tub grinder equipped with a 17.8- or 10.2-cm screen, resulting in mean particle sizes of 11.54 and 7.68 mm for long-cut and short-cut, respectively. Treatments were based on dry-rolled corn and included 8% long-cut or 8% short-cut prairie hay (DM basis). Particle distribution and peNDF were estimated using the Penn State Particle Separator. Data were analyzed using mixed models. Treatment was included as a fixed effect and block as a random effect for pen-level variables, with pen serving as the experimental unit. For variables measured on individual animals, animal nested within pen was included as a random effect, and day was included as a repeated measure with animal nested within pen as the subject. Decreasing forage particle size reduced dietary peNDF from 14.23% to 12.33% of DM (P = 0.014). Neutral detergent fiber digestibility was reduced in short-cut TMR (P < 0.001), whereas DM and starch digestibility were unaffected (P ≥ 0.62). Feedlot performance and carcass characteristics did not differ between treatments (P ≥ 0.18). Fecal pH differed between treatments at specific sampling days, resulting in a treatment × day interaction (P = 0.001). Serum amyloid A concentrations tended to be greater for long-cut TMR (P = 0.09). Rumination time did not differ between treatments (P = 0.53). These results suggest that a 1.90 percentage-point decrease in dietary peNDF via forage particle size did not affect growth performance, rumination behavior, or carcass characteristics in finishing beef cattle, but may reduce NDF digestibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42860050What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.