Trial reportCancer medicine2026
Combined Active Bone Marrow-Sparing Radiotherapy and Prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF to Reduce Severe Neutropenia During Platinum-Doublet Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Phase II Trial.
Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlatinum-doublet concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is frequently complicated by severe neutropenia. This Phase II trial investigated whether combining active bone marrow-sparing (ABMS) radiotherapy with prophylactic pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) could reduce the incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia below a prespecified historical benchmark of 30%.
methodsPatients with FIGO 2018 stage IIA2-IVA LACC received SPECT-guided ABMS radiotherapy (45 Gy external beam plus 30 Gy brachytherapy) concurrent with paclitaxel/carboplatin every 21 days for 4 cycles followed by prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF. Using Simon's two-stage design (α = 0.05, β = 0.20), we tested whether grade ≥ 3 neutropenia could be reduced from a historical benchmark of 30% to ≤ 15%. The primary endpoint was grade ≥ 3 neutropenia incidence; secondary endpoints included other cytopenias, treatment completion, and survival outcomes.
resultsFifty-four patients were enrolled. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia occurred in 13.0% (7/54; 95% CI: 5.4%-24.9%), meeting the prespecified success criterion (one-sided exact binomial test, p = 0.003 versus the 30% benchmark). Other grade ≥ 3 toxicities included leukopenia (18.5%), anemia (3.7%), thrombocytopenia (5.6%), and febrile neutropenia (1.9%). Overall, 85.2% of patients completed all 4 planned chemotherapy cycles, and all completed radiotherapy within 8 weeks (median overall treatment time: 50 days). At a median follow-up of 40 months, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 88.8% and 88.9%, respectively (6 events each); the study was not powered for survival efficacy.
conclusionsThe combination of ABMS radiotherapy and prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF was associated with a grade ≥ 3 neutropenia rate of 13.0% and a chemotherapy completion rate of 85.2% during platinum-doublet CCRT for LACC. Because the single-arm design and reliance on historical controls preclude causal inference, these findings are hypothesis-generating and primarily establish the operational feasibility of this dual hematoprotection approach. Formal evaluation of safety and efficacy requires the ongoing randomized trial (ChiCTR2400087321).
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100046911. Registered May 30, 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.