ReviewJournal of inflammation research2026
The Use of Montelukast in Pediatric Asthma and Anti-Inflammatory Effects - Easy Choice or a Balancing Act?
Review in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Montelukast is a selective cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 antagonist with an established, though nuanced, role in the management of asthma and allergic rhinitis. By inhibiting leukotriene-mediated signaling, montelukast targets a pathway involved in bronchoconstriction, mucus secretion, vascular permeability, eosinophil recruitment, cytokine release, and airway remodeling. Available evidence indicates that montelukast may reduce several markers of allergic inflammation, including fractional exhaled nitric oxide, peripheral and tissue eosinophilia, eosinophil-derived mediators, adhesion molecules, selected cytokines, and markers related to airway remodeling. These effects are most consistently demonstrated in asthma and allergic rhinitis, while evidence in chronic urticaria, atopic dermatitis, and other inflammatory conditions remains limited or exploratory. Montelukast's once-daily oral administration and age-adjusted pediatric formulations make it a practical option in selected children, particularly when inhaled therapy is difficult or adherence is problematic. However, montelukast should not be regarded as a direct substitute for corticosteroid-based anti-inflammatory therapy. Current evidence and guideline positioning support its use mainly as an add-on controller, or an alternative when more efficacious treatment is contraindicated. The benefit-risk balance is further shaped by concerns regarding neuropsychiatric adverse events, especially in children, although evidence remains heterogeneous. Current data show no increased risk of severe, diagnostically coded neuropsychiatric events, yet milder sleep-related and behavioral symptoms are consistently reported, so that caution and active monitoring remain warranted. Overall, montelukast remains a biologically plausible and clinically useful therapy, but its value depends on appropriate patient selection and realistic expectations of its anti-inflammatory potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.