ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Primary Response to β-Blocker Therapy in Periocular Infantile Hemangioma - A Proposal for Ophthalmological Indicators.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine primary ocular response to β-blocker therapy in periocular infantile hemangioma (IH) and to apply defined ophthalmological indicators for the response assessment. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study of 85 infants treated for periocular IH with β-blocker between June 2008 and December 2020. IH characteristics, associated ocular features, and implementation of β-blocker therapy were recorded. Ophthalmological treatment indications were reevaluated, and response to treatment was defined as the resolution of indications according to the following categories: 1) anisoastigmatism ≥ 1.0 diopter, 2) progressive eyelid closure, 3) exophthalmos, 4) other ocular defect, 5) prophylaxis, and 6) non-ocular indication. Results: β-blocker therapy was initiated at a median age of 3.0 months (IQR 2.0-5.0) and continued for a median of 9.0 months (IQR 7.0-16.5). Primary ocular response was achieved in 89% (95% CI: 79-95) of the patients. Seven patients were left with ≥ 1.0 diopter residual anisoastigmatism and mean cylinder power 1.50 D (range 1.25-3.00 D), one patient had partial eyelid closure, and three patients inadequate cosmesis despite complete ocular response. In isolated cases, astigmatism enhanced during β-blocker therapy. Repeated treatment periods were administered to 13 (15%) patients. No factors predictive of incomplete response or retreatment could be identified. Conclusions: Ocular complications of periocular IH resolved in most patients during β-blocker therapy. The application of the defined ophthalmological response indicators allowed for simple and consistent outcome assessment. Careful monitoring is essential during and after therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.