ArticleVascular health and risk management2026
Doppler Ultrasound-Derived Blood Flow Parameters Associated with Significant Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis in a Large Vietnamese Hemodialysis Cohort.
Article in Vascular health and risk management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis is a major cause of vascular access dysfunction in hemodialysis patients. This study evaluated the associations between Doppler ultrasound-derived blood flow parameters measured at different AVF sites and Doppler-defined significant AVF stenosis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult hemodialysis patients with native AVFs who underwent Doppler ultrasound evaluation at Cho Ray Hospital, Vietnam. Blood flow parameters were measured at the brachial artery, anastomosis, 5 cm from the anastomosis, and 10 cm from the anastomosis. Doppler-defined significant stenosis was defined as ≥50% luminal narrowing compared with the adjacent normal vessel segment. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations between Doppler flow parameters and significant stenosis. Results: Among 1,541 patients, 585 (38.0%) had Doppler-defined significant AVF stenosis. Patients with significant stenosis had lower blood flow values at all evaluated sites, including Qmin and Qmean (all p<0.001). After adjustment for demographic and AVF characteristics, higher blood flow values remained associated with lower odds of significant stenosis. The adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) per 500 mL/min increase were 0.73 (0.67-0.79) for brachial artery flow, 0.76 (0.71-0.83) for anastomosis flow, 0.83 (0.78-0.89) for flow measured 5 cm from the anastomosis, 0.81 (0.75-0.87) for flow measured 10 cm from the anastomosis, 0.63 (0.56-0.71) for Qmin, and 0.76 (0.70-0.82) for Qmean. Significant stenosis was still observed in some patients with relatively high flow values. Conclusion: Lower Doppler ultrasound-derived blood flow values at multiple AVF sites were associated with Doppler-defined significant AVF stenosis and may support comprehensive vascular access assessment. Further prospective studies using independent reference standards and clinically relevant outcomes are needed before these parameters can be used as validated predictive tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.