Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859791›Full record

ReviewSubstance abuse and rehabilitation2026

Connected Care: Challenges and Potential of Digital Interventions in Substance Use Disorder - a Narrative Review.

André Ricardo de Almeida, Rogério Adriano Bosso, Kátia Isicawa Sousa, Vinícius Marinacci Cardim, Alessandra Diehl, Renata Cruz Soares de Azevedo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

André Ricardo de AlmeidaDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-0371-5681
Rogério Adriano BossoDepartment of Neurosciences and Behavioral Sciences, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3246-702X
Kátia Isicawa SousaDepartment of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2282-1742
Vinícius Marinacci CardimDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0004-6078-7543
Alessandra DiehlScientific Department, Brazilian Association for the Study of Alcohol and Other Drugs (ABEAD), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3881-4283
Renata Cruz Soares de AzevedoDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7098-7109

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: mHealth interventions have demonstrated positive outcomes across various health domains and represent promising tools for supporting the treatment of Substance Use Disorders (SUD). However, gaps remain regarding user and clinician engagement, factors associated with positive outcomes, and the need for cultural adaptation. Objective: To analyze recent literature on the effectiveness of mHealth interventions in the treatment of SUD, identifying interaction patterns and functionalities that promote adherence in diverse contexts. Methods: A narrative review was conducted based on PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PUBMED, SCOPUS, EMBASE and WEB OF SCIENCE for English-language articles published between 2014 and 2024. The review focused on barriers, facilitators, and the effectiveness of implementing digital interventions (mHealth) in the management of SUD. Results: Of the 593 articles identified, 34 were included. Despite considerable heterogeneity in evaluated outcomes, digital interventions demonstrated positive impacts on smoking cessation, contingency management for opioids, and reduction in alcohol and cannabis use. Notably, response variability was observed according to cultural and generational differences, severity of use, substance type, and digital literacy. Additional challenges include long-term adherence and a scarcity of studies in low- and middle-income countries. Conclusion: Digital interventions show tangible clinical benefits across multiple substances, with usability and connected care driving sustained engagement. The use of mHealth, particularly as a complementary and combined approach in treating individuals with SUD, is associated with clinical and accessibility benefits. However, further research is required to evaluate its applicability across diverse populations and contexts.

Indexed as

digital healthmobile applicationssubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID42859791
PMCPMC13653549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.