Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859766›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

3D-Printed Models as Catalysts for Neuroanatomy Learning: An Immersive Educational Experience for Medical Students.

Noé Pérez Carrillo, Dan López Vázquez, Erick David Muñoz Carpio, Mixel Zair Baltierra Hernández, Francisco de Jesús García-Mendoza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noé Pérez CarrilloNeurosurgery, General Hospital of Mexico "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, MEX.
Dan López VázquezNeurosurgery, Hospital de Jesus, Mexico City, MEX.
Erick David Muñoz CarpioFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Xochimilco, Mexico City, MEX.
Mixel Zair Baltierra HernándezFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Xochimilco, Mexico City, MEX.
Francisco de Jesús García-MendozaCentral Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, MEX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Neuroanatomy presents unique challenges due to the three-dimensional (3D) complexity of the nervous system. This study evaluates the impact of 3D-printed brainstem models on neuroanatomy teaching to medical students. Methods A descriptive, cross-sectional, non-randomized, between-group study was conducted to compare students' perceptions of 3D-printed anatomical models versus traditional schematic diagrams. Participants were recruited through non-probability convenience sampling and allocated to a 3D-model group (n = 38) or a traditional-diagram group (n = 23). A Likert-type questionnaire assessed perceived motivation, clarity, understanding, usefulness, and satisfaction. Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for between-group comparisons. Results Sixty-one responses were analyzed. Compared with traditional schematic diagrams, 3D-printed models received significantly higher ratings for conceptual clarity, overall satisfaction, and preference for future use (p < 0.05). In contrast, schematic diagrams received higher ratings for motivation, a finding that may reflect unmeasured factors such as prior familiarity with conventional learning resources. Conclusions The use of 3D printing improves the neuroanatomical learning experience for medical students, as it is perceived as an innovative, clear, and complementary resource. Its implementation can transform traditional neuroscience teaching.

Indexed as

anatomical modelseducational innovationmedical educationneuroanatomythree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID42859766
PMCPMC13653418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.