ArticleObesity pillars2026
Patient expectations and healthcare professional education in obesity care: A comparative qualitative study.
Article in Obesity pillars, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient expectations of obesity care and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) educational preparation have largely been studied independently. Comparing these perspectives may reveal whether university education prepares graduates to translate obesity-related knowledge into the capabilities patients consider important in clinical care. Methods: This was a secondary comparative qualitative analysis conducted using previously collected interviews with 20 adults living with obesity and 21 newly qualified HCPs. Original transcripts were re-analysed in relation to a new comparative research question. Patterns within each dataset were examined and then synthesised across datasets to identify how patient-reported expectations corresponded with HCP-reported university preparation. Results: The comparison revealed that apparent alignment in broad principles often diverged at the level of clinical application. Both cohorts recognised obesity as multifactorial and emphasised sensitive communication and appropriate management; however, patients expected these principles to shape how obesity was understood, discussed and acted upon within their individual circumstances. HCPs described variable preparation for translating conceptual knowledge into individualised clinical encounters, weight conversations, treatment-oriented discussions and navigation of onward care. A further cross-dataset pattern concerned integration: patients experienced obesity care as fragmented across conditions and specialties, while HCPs described learning about obesity across disconnected subjects and clinical contexts. Across both cohorts, the main divergence was in how obesity-related knowledge was integrated and applied in clinical practice. Conclusions: The comparative synthesis suggests that the greatest divergence between patient expectations and HCP education lies primarily in translating fragmented obesity-related learning into coherent clinical practice. University education may therefore benefit from greater integration of obesity-specific knowledge, communication and care pathways, rather than solely increasing curricular content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.