SynthesisReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Demographic Representation in Clinical Trials for Transthyretin-Associated Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Underrepresentation of minority groups in clinical trials exacerbates health disparities and limits the generalizability of findings. Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a condition that disproportionately affects certain racial and ethnic groups, yet the extent to which trial enrollment reflects disease burden remains unclear. Misalignment between disease prevalence and trial representation may delay treatment development and increase the economic burden associated with late diagnosis and suboptimal management. To evaluate racial and ethnic representation in completed U.S.-based ATTR-CM clinical trials by comparing observed participant enrollment with expected enrollment based on disease prevalence, and to assess whether demographic reporting and representation improved following the 2017 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Final Rule. Methods: This systematic review assessed US-based ATTR clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov through 2025 (search date: February 12, 2025). Only completed trials with publicly available results were included. Demographic data were extracted at the trial level. For each group, an enrollment fraction (EF) was calculated as observed enrollment ÷ expected enrollment, based on the Cardiac Amyloidosis Registry Study (CARS) prevalence; adequacy was defined as EF ≥0.75. Results: Of the 264 clinical trials on ATTR identified, 16 met the inclusion criteria. African American individuals/individuals of African descent had EFs below the adequacy threshold of 0.75 across all reviewed trial phases compared with their Asian or White counterparts. Following implementation of the FDA Final Rule in 2017, reporting of demographic data increased in the overall study population (from 60% to 83.3%). Although the racial distribution remained significantly different from the expected population distribution in both periods, the enrollment fraction for Black participants declined from 0.291 before 2017 to 0.125 after 2017, with similar decreases observed among other minority groups. Conclusions: Black individuals remain substantially underrepresented in US-based ATTR-CM clinical trials despite improved demographic reporting after the 2017 FDA Final Rule. Actionable strategies, including community engagement, diversification of trial sites, enrollment targets, and sponsor accountability, are urgently needed to improve representativeness and expand access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.