Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859713›Full record

ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026

Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Modified Cox-Maze IV Surgery: Comparing Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation and Rheumatic Mitral Regurgitation.

Ke Xu, Jingcheng Wu, Yi Li, Lailong Sun, Ming Yan, Fuwei Zhang, Chaobing Liu, SongLin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ke XuDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, First Clinical Medical College of China Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, 443002 Yichang, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2344-9961
Jingcheng WuDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, First Clinical Medical College of China Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, 443002 Yichang, Hubei, China.
Yi LiDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, First Clinical Medical College of China Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, 443002 Yichang, Hubei, China.
Lailong SunDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, First Clinical Medical College of China Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, 443002 Yichang, Hubei, China.
Ming YanDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, First Clinical Medical College of China Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, 443002 Yichang, Hubei, China.
Fuwei ZhangDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, First Clinical Medical College of China Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, 443002 Yichang, Hubei, China.
Chaobing LiuDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, First Clinical Medical College of China Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, 443002 Yichang, Hubei, China.
SongLin ZhangDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, First Clinical Medical College of China Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, 443002 Yichang, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The comparative efficacy of the modified Cox-Maze IV procedure (CMP IV) in treating atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) and those with rheumatic mitral regurgitation (RMR) remains inadequately characterized. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate and compare postoperative AF recurrence rates and clinical outcomes between these two etiologically distinct groups. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 221 patients (AFMR group: n = 53; RMR group: n = 168) with concomitant long-standing persistent AF who underwent mitral valve surgery combined with modified CMP IV or other concomitant procedures at our institution between January 2019 and September 2024. To address baseline imbalances, propensity score matching was performed at a 1:1 ratio, resulting in well-matched cohorts of 32 patients with AFMR and 32 with RMR patients for the final analysis. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence. Statistical comparisons utilized chi-square tests, Results: After PSM, 32 patients remained in each group with balanced baselines. The AFMR group showed a higher trend toward postoperative AF recurrence. Pre‑discharge AF recurrence rates did not differ significantly between groups (37.5% vs. 12.5%; Conclusions: In patients undergoing mitral valve surgery with modified CMP IV, those with AFMR exhibit a significantly higher risk of postoperative AF recurrence compared with patients with RMR, despite similar early-term survival outcomes. Postoperative AF monitoring should be intensified in patients with AFMR to improve long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationatrial fibrillation recurrenceatrial functional mitral regurgitationmitral valve insufficiencymodified Cox-Maze IV procedurerheumatic mitral regurgitation

Identifiers

PMID42859713
PMCPMC13653180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.