ArticleOrthopedic research and reviews2026
Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Three Acetabular Plate Designs with Different Bridge Geometries.
Article in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acetabular fractures are complex injuries of the hip joint. Careful design of fixation plates is crucial for achieving stable osteosynthesis, especially in patients with poor bone quality. Finite element analysis (FEA) is widely used for biomechanical evaluation of orthopedic implants. Objective: The aim of this study was to perform a comparative finite element analysis of three acetabular plate designs differing in bridge geometry and to identify the configuration with the most favourable biomechanical performance. We hypothesized that a plate with two parallel bridges would provide more favourable stress distribution and a higher safety factor compared to single-bridge and non-parallel-bridge designs. Methods: A three-dimensional model of the pelvic bone was reconstructed from CT data. Three titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V, thickness 2.5 mm) plates with different bridge configurations (single bridge, two parallel bridges, two non-parallel bridges) were virtually implanted using CAD software (KOMPAS-3D, Autodesk Inventor). The FEA model included cortical and cancellous bone with mechanical properties taken from the literature. A load of 250 N applied at 15° to the inner plate surface simulated partial weight-bearing in the early postoperative period. Von Mises equivalent stress, linear displacement, and safety factor were evaluated. Results: Maximum von Mises equivalent stresses were 207 MPa for the single-bridge plate, 170 MPa for the two-parallel-bridge plate, and 344 MPa for the two-non-parallel-bridge plate. The corresponding minimum safety factors were 1.33, 1.62, and 0.8. The obtained stress values are consistent with findings from similar studies. Conclusion: The plate with two parallel bridges exhibited the highest safety factor and appears to be the most promising candidate for further experimental evaluation based on the present computational findings. The single-bridge and two-non-parallel-bridge designs require further design modification, particularly in the bridge cross-sections, because of their lower static safety margins. FEA is a useful tool for comparative biomechanical assessment of implant designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.