ReviewCureus2026
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Pulpotomy in Permanent Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Irreversible pulpitis in permanent teeth has traditionally been managed by root canal treatment. However, currently, vital pulp therapy, especially full and partial pulpotomy, is gaining popularity as a conservative technique to maintain pulp vitality and preserve tooth structure. This systematic review was carried out following the guidelines of the PRISMA 2020. A literature search was conducted using electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar for studies published from 2010 to 2026. Following screening and eligibility assessment according to predefined inclusion criteria, 16 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. A total of 375 records were identified. Following removal of duplicates and screening, 16 studies were eligible and included in the review. Most included studies were randomized controlled trials, while a few were prospective or retrospective cohort studies. Overall, the included studies consistently reported favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes following pulpotomy in permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis, particularly when calcium silicate-based materials such as mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France), calcium-enriched mixture (CEM), TotalFill (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland), and other bioceramics were used. Pulpotomy appears to be an effective and predictable conservative treatment option for permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis, demonstrating favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes across both short- and long-term follow-up periods. However, additional high-quality multicenter studies with extended follow-up are required to further strengthen treatment recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.