Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859612›Full record

ArticleChild & adolescent social work journal : C & A2026

Ambiguous Compliments and Encouragement: Young Fathers' Experiences of Care, Responsibility and Youth.

Marijke Sniekers, Lieke Tillmann, Milotte Hamer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child & adolescent social work journal : C & A, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marijke SniekersZuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Lieke TillmannZuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Milotte HamerZuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though fathers matter in the lives of their children, their partners and in society, engaging fathers in social work services has remained hard to follow through. Our participatory action research project in a youth care network in the Netherlands aimed at strengthening the inclusion of young fathers in youth care practice. This article explores how young fathers experience their fatherhood in relation to gender and age norms. Their narratives reveal that age, gender and ethnicity intersect to shape norms of youthfulness from which young fathers deviate by positioning themselves as mature. The young fathers describe their care work as childcare and as relational work, while aligning these care practices with traditional norms of masculinity such as providership and responsibility. Although caring fatherhood is increasingly recognised, they experience ambivalent reactions on community and institutional levels. They receive ambiguous compliments and encouragement that evoke feelings of stigma. Their fatherhood brings positive changes, yet structural barriers in social work systems persist. They often feel unrecognised by social work professionals. The project, however, contributed to professional development through an enhanced father-inclusive support method and training programme. By closely looking into the fathers' perspectives, this article calls for a shift in social work practice and policy. Findings underline that meaningful engagement with young fathers requires addressing institutional norms, ensuring equal recognition of fathers and mothers, and adopting gender- and age-sensitive approaches that acknowledge the diverse realities of young fathers.

Indexed as

AgeCare WorkFatherhoodGender normsMasculinityParticipatory Action ResearchSocial WorkYoung fathersYouth

Identifiers

PMID42859612
PMCPMC13652920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.