Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859607›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2026

Long-term outcomes of splanchnic radiofrequency ablation for control of chronic abdominal visceral, non-malignant pain.

Leonardo Kapural, Giuliano Lo Bianco, Ishan Viradia, Neil Poddar, Barbara Bekavac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leonardo KapuralFrom Carolinas Pain Institute, 145 Kimel Park Drive, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA.
Giuliano Lo BiancoAnesthesiology and Pain Department, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio Cefalù, Palermo, Italy.
Ishan ViradiaFrom Carolinas Pain Institute, 145 Kimel Park Drive, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA.
Neil PoddarFrom Carolinas Pain Institute, 145 Kimel Park Drive, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA.
Barbara BekavacFrom Carolinas Pain Institute, 145 Kimel Park Drive, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Splanchnic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective therapy for the treatment of severe abdominal pain. Although it was first described almost 25 years ago, long-term data on longevity and effectiveness are still lacking. Here, we describe the long-term outcomes of a larger retrospective cohort of patients with chronic non-malignant abdominal pain. Methods: Following Institutional Review Board IRB approval, patient data were collected from our electronic medical records of 52 patients who underwent splanchnic RFA. Data collected included patients' VAS scores, opioid use, and frequency of nausea at baseline and at 1, 6, and 12 months. We summarized data using descriptive statistics for continuous variables. Student's t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used. Results: The mean age of the study participants was 54.3 ± 16.3 years (range, 19-87; median, 57.5), and the mean BMI was 29 kg/m Conclusions: The majority of patients experienced long-term benefit from splanchnic nerve RFA for the treatment of chronic non-malignant abdominal pain and associated nausea. Moreover, given the very low rate of mild adverse events RFA of the splanchnic nerves is a safe technique that should be considered as a treatment option in patients with chronic visceral abdominal pain.

Indexed as

Celiac plexusChronic abdominal painNon-malignant abdominal painSplanchnic blockSplanchnic nervesSplanchnic radiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID42859607
PMCPMC13653465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.