Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859583›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026

Bacterial Colonization in Monofilament Sutures of Different Materials Following Periodontal Surgeries: A Microbial Analysis Study.

Abdulaziz Alsakr, Lamia Mohammed Alammar, Mohammed Nasser Alasqah, Abdullah Saad Alqahtani, Khalid Gufran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdulaziz AlsakrDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences College of Dentistry Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University Alkharj 19472 Saudi Arabia psau.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2878-3871
Lamia Mohammed AlammarPostgraduate Student in Periodontics College of Medicine and Dentistry Riyadh Elm University Riyadh 11421 Saudi Arabia riyadh.edu.sa.
Mohammed Nasser AlasqahDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences College of Dentistry Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University Alkharj 19472 Saudi Arabia psau.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2519-6578
Abdullah Saad AlqahtaniDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences College of Dentistry Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University Alkharj 19472 Saudi Arabia psau.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0474-7067
Khalid GufranDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences College of Dentistry Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University Alkharj 19472 Saudi Arabia psau.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9623-559X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to assess and compare the extent of bacterial colonization on various monofilament suture types, including polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyglycolide-co-caprolactone (PGCL Monocryl), triclosan-coated polydioxanone (Monocryl Plus), and polyamide (nylon). The investigation also aimed to identify predominant bacterial species colonizing these materials and evaluate their potential impact on wound healing and infection control. Methods: An in vitro experimental design combined with clinical sampling was employed. Sutures were retrieved from patients following periodontal surgery between days 7 and 10. Microbiological culture methods, colony-forming unit (CFU) quantification, bacterial identification through Vitek2, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were utilized to analyze both aerobic and anaerobic bacterial growth. Statistical analysis was performed to compare bacterial adhesion among the different suture types. Results: The results revealed that PTFE sutures exhibited the lowest bacterial colonization, recording mean aerobic and anaerobic counts of 9.8 × 10 Conclusion: PTFE demonstrated the lowest numerical bacterial colonization among the evaluated suture materials. However, the differences between the groups were not statistically significant and should therefore be interpreted with caution. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings. Clinical Relevance: The study provides preliminary evidence on bacterial colonization of different monofilament suture materials. These findings may assist clinicians in selecting suture materials, but larger clinical studies are required before definitive recommendations can be made.

Indexed as

antimicrobial suturesbacterial colonizationbiofilm formationinfection controlmonocrylmonofilament sutureperiodontal surgeryPTFE

Identifiers

PMID42859583
PMCPMC13653258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.