ArticleJAAD international2026
Development and validation of an artificial intelligence model for basal cell carcinoma detection and section completeness assessment in Mohs micrographic surgery in an Asian cohort.
Article in JAAD international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mohs micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) requires rapid intraoperative histologic interpretation. This is labor-intensive and incomplete tissue sections compromise margin assessment. Artificial intelligence has shown promise in BCC detection but section completeness assessment remains underexplored. Objective: Develop and validate an artificial intelligence model for BCC detection and section completeness assessment on Mohs frozen-section histology. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study using histology slides from 130 patients who underwent Mohs surgery for BCC from 2017 to 2025. Whole slides were digitized and annotated. A convolutional neural network model was trained to detect BCC and classify section completeness. Model performance assessment with standard performance metrics and region-of-interest evaluation was performed. Results: The BCC detection model achieved accuracy 0.993, sensitivity 0.915, specificity 0.996, precision 0.889, F1-score 0.902 at the tile level, with comparable region-of-interest sensitivity (0.910). The section completeness model achieved accuracy 0.890, sensitivity 0.948, specificity 0.524, precision 0.927, and F1-score 0.937. Limitations: Single-center retrospective design, limited representation of rare BCC subtypes, and no direct comparison with human experts. Conclusion: Although the specificity for section completeness was low, further research and additional model training may enable development of a model with improved performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.