Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859580›Full record

ArticleJAAD international2026

Development and validation of an artificial intelligence model for basal cell carcinoma detection and section completeness assessment in Mohs micrographic surgery in an Asian cohort.

Li Yang Loo, Wen-Bin Luo, Isaac Hong-Kei Lam, Seow Ye Heng, Fan Foon Cheo, John Huang, Shang Wei Song, Terrence Yeoh, Fung Xue Feng, Siti Nuruljannah Baharudin and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAAD international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Li Yang LooDepartment of Dermatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Wen-Bin LuoDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Isaac Hong-Kei LamDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Seow Ye HengDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Fan Foon CheoDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
John HuangAI Singapore (ex-AI Apprenticeship Programme), Singapore.
Shang Wei SongAI Singapore (ex-AI Apprenticeship Programme), Singapore.
Terrence YeohAI Singapore (ex-AI Apprenticeship Programme), Singapore.
Fung Xue FengAI Singapore, Singapore.
Siti Nuruljannah BaharudinAI Singapore, Singapore.
Li Yan KhorDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Chee Leong ChengDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Po Yin TangDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Choon Chiat OhDepartment of Dermatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mohs micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) requires rapid intraoperative histologic interpretation. This is labor-intensive and incomplete tissue sections compromise margin assessment. Artificial intelligence has shown promise in BCC detection but section completeness assessment remains underexplored. Objective: Develop and validate an artificial intelligence model for BCC detection and section completeness assessment on Mohs frozen-section histology. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study using histology slides from 130 patients who underwent Mohs surgery for BCC from 2017 to 2025. Whole slides were digitized and annotated. A convolutional neural network model was trained to detect BCC and classify section completeness. Model performance assessment with standard performance metrics and region-of-interest evaluation was performed. Results: The BCC detection model achieved accuracy 0.993, sensitivity 0.915, specificity 0.996, precision 0.889, F1-score 0.902 at the tile level, with comparable region-of-interest sensitivity (0.910). The section completeness model achieved accuracy 0.890, sensitivity 0.948, specificity 0.524, precision 0.927, and F1-score 0.937. Limitations: Single-center retrospective design, limited representation of rare BCC subtypes, and no direct comparison with human experts. Conclusion: Although the specificity for section completeness was low, further research and additional model training may enable development of a model with improved performance.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebasal cell carcinomaconvolutional neural networkdermatopathologyMohs micrographic surgerytissue completenesstumor detection

Identifiers

PMID42859580
PMCPMC13652853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.