Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42859554›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2026

Immune-Complex-Based In Vitro Deubiquitination Assay.

Florence Dô, Sylvain Meloche, Marc J Servant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Florence DôFaculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Sylvain MelocheInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Marc J ServantFaculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deubiquitinases (DUBs) are attractive therapeutic targets within the ubiquitin-proteasome system, in part because four of the five DUB subfamilies are cysteine proteases amenable to the development of potent, selective inhibitors, as recently demonstrated for USP7. Identifying DUBs that deubiquitylate and stabilize specific human oncogenic proteins is therefore a promising approach to discovering new mechanism-based targets for cancer therapy. Several complementary experimental strategies are typically required to identify bona fide DUB-substrate pairs. Here, we present an efficient, straightforward in vitro immune-complex protocol to validate USP17-mediated deubiquitylation of the transcriptional co-activator β-catenin. In this assay, both β-catenin and USP17 are immunopurified from transiently transfected 293T cells and then combined to assess USP17 enzymatic activity. The protocol describes the in vitro enzymatic assay performed on immunopurified complexes and the immunoblot-based readout. It can be readily adapted to other DUBs and substrates for mechanistic studies. Key features • Requires prior experience with cell culture, immunoprecipitation, and immunoblot analysis. • Uses plasmids encoding epitope-tagged DUB (here, USP17), the substrate of the DUB of interest (here, β-catenin), and ubiquitin, which are transiently expressed in 293T cells. • Expression in mammalian cells preserves DUB (here, USP17) essential post-translational modifications. • Adaptable to other DUB-substrate pairs.

Indexed as

Deubiquitinating enzymesImmunoprecipitationIn vitro deubiquitinase assayUSP17β-catenin

Identifiers

PMID42859554
PMCPMC13652713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.